Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, Meters. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, Yards. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Progression and Peoples Behavior, 29(2), 119–126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Meters. (2000). The area off accessory from inside the peoples mating. Post on Standard Psychology, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A beneficial. (2002). Sites paradox reviewed. Record off Personal Situations, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, Meters., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Web sites paradox: A social technical one to decreases social wedding and emotional well-getting? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, R.Meters., & Fields, J. Meters. (2001). Number, timing, and you may singaporean piger til Г¦gteskab time of marriages and you will divorces. Most recent Inhabitants Account, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: You.S. Census Bureau, 2005).
Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional data out-of intimacy, appeal, and you will commitment: Analysis the new assumptions of the triangular principle off like. Mental Reports, 90(step 3,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.90.step three.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Age. (2004). Perception ideal on undertaking even worse: Social contrasting inside intimate relationships. Record of Personality and you may Personal Psychology, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A good., & Gailliot, M. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The brand new implicit cognition from romantic rivalry. Record of Identity and you can Public Mindset, 97(1), 74–87.
An effective. (2001)mitment and you may relationships repair elements
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. An excellent., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automatic inattention to help you attractive choice: The latest evolved therapy away from relationship repair. Evolution and Peoples Conclusion, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. Elizabeth. (1981). Sequential data out-of argument and you may agreement during the distressed and you can nondistressed relationship people. Journal from Contacting and you can Clinical Mindset, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. An effective., Green, Good. S., Gleason, Meters. J. (2002). Relationships creation on the web: What’s the larger attraction? Log off Societal Activities, 58(1), 9–30.
The many benefits of self-confident illusions: Idealization plus the design off satisfaction inside close matchmaking
Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-comparison objectives inside romantic relationships: A model of around the globe enhancement and you will particular verification. For the P. Noller & J. An effective. Feeney (Eds.), Knowledge ents regarding examination of few telecommunications (pp. 32–58). Nyc, NY: Cambridge College Press.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the consumer-specialist thread from contact regarding accessory concept. Psychotherapy: Idea, Research, Routine, Education, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Brand new public monitoring program: Increased sensitiveness in order to personal signs as an adaptive reaction to public exemption. In the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The fresh new personal outcast: Ostracism, public exclusion, getting rejected, and bullying (pp. 213–226). New york, NY: Psychology Press.
Enter, T., & Lydon, J. Age. (2001). Global and certain relational habits regarding contact with public relationships. Record out-of Personality and you will Social Psychology, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. An effective., Tran, S., ). Attachment and pointers trying during the romantic relationships. Identification and you may Societal Mindset Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. Roentgen., & Spinner, B. (2001). General and particular attachment representations inside adulthood: Could there be a relationship?. Log Out-of Personal And private Matchmaking, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. For the J. Harvey & A great. Wenzel (Eds.), Personal intimate dating: Repair and you can improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A beneficial. D. (2000). Projection in person impression among spouses just like the a function of the fresh new resemblance inside their mutual experience. Identification And you can Societal Therapy Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1980). Outcomes of salience regarding extrinsic advantages for the liking and you can loving. Log away from Identification and Societal Psychology, 38(3), 453–460.
