The results are expressed as means and standard deviations, unless stated https://internationalwomen.net/de/mongolische-frauen/ otherwise. Between-group differences in subject characteristics were tested using one-way ANOVA followed by pairwise comparisons using Tukey’s multiple comparison procedure if a significant F test was obtained. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to adjust body composition results for comparison across ethnic groups. Before carrying out the ANCOVA, similarity of regression slopes among the ethnic groups was verified by examining the significance of the interaction between the covariate(s) and the group variable. Relationships between body composition measurements and age were investigated by multiple regression analysis controlling for independent variables such as height and weight. Potential interaction terms and non-linear relationships were examined for selected variables. Pearson’s correlation coefficients are presented for bivariate linear relationships with age and partial correlation coefficients where adjustment is made for weight and height. Data were analysed using SPSS version 13.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results with P < 0·05>
Demographics and you can whole-body composition
Muscles composition characteristics of your victims is summarised by sex and you may ethnicity for the Dining table dos. European men have been younger, tall and had all the way down FM and you may part of BF than just the competitors regarding almost every other around three groups. Western european women was younger than just Western Indian female, and you will was in fact large together with lower FM and part of BF than simply their equivalents regarding almost every other about three communities. Brand new Far eastern Indian guys had knee lbs and you can BMC but higher percentage of BF than the Eu, Maori and you can Pacific men. Brand new Far eastern Indian women as well as met with the higher percentage of BF and lower BMC of the four cultural communities, while you are their body lbs was lower than Maori and you will Pacific female and not notably not the same as the brand new European female. After variations for age, peak and you will lbs, Far eastern Indians met with the higher FM, low body weight-free size and lowest BMC of four ethnic teams, if you find yourself Pacific encountered the reduced FM and you may highest weight-totally free size, for both individuals, together with large BMC for men (Desk step three).
Relationship anywhere between Bmi and you can portion of surplus fat
Curvilinear relationships between the percentage of BF and BMI for each ethnic group were linearised by logarithmically transforming BMI (Fig. 1)parison of regression equations of the percentage of BF on the logarithm of BMI with age as a covariate and with sex and ethnicity as group variables indicated significant heterogeneity in the slopes of the male and female equations (P < 0·0001).>
Fig. 1 Relationship between the percentage of body fat (BF) and BMI of European (?), Maori (0), Pacific Island (^) and Asian Indian (?) (a) men and (b) women. The linear regressions are: percentage of BF = 117·7 log10(BMI) ? 144·2 (standard error of estimate (SEE) = 5·2 %, r 2 0·61, n 124) for European men (-); percentage of BF = 101·3 log10(BMI) ? 122·0 (SEE = 4·6 %, r 2 0·74, n 109) for Maori men (- – -); percentage of BF = 93·6 log10(BMI) ? 113·6 (SEE = 4·1 %, r 2 0·68, n 104) for Pacific Island men (·····); percentage of BF = 78·6 log10(BMI) ? 79·4 (SEE = 5·0 %, r 2 0·52, n 117) for Asian Indian men (-·-·); percentage of BF = 103·5 log10(BMI) ? 109·7 (SEE = 4·8 %, r 2 0·72, n 186) for European women (-); percentage of BF = 74·8 log10(BMI) ? 70·3 (SEE = 3·9 %, r 2 0·72, n 90) for Maori women (—); percentage of BF = 65·2 log10(BMI) ? 57·8 (SEE = 4·1 %, r 2 0·65, n 97) for Pacific Island women (·····); percentage of BF = 71·0 log10(BMI) ? 57·7 (SEE = 4·4 %, r 2 0·60, n 107) for Asian Indian women (-·-·).
